operations year by year. All employees, including the founders,
have employment contracts and executed NDAs. Firm A has
maintained professional liability insurance on each project.
Firm B has four clients, two of which are green energy
companies dependent on government funding for projects to
progress, one of the remaining clients a municipality, and the
last client is a big-box pharmaceutical start-up company. There
are no multi-year exclusive service contracts. Twelve of the
twenty staff members are independent contractors. There are no
employment agreements, or NDAs in place, and the firm
allowed its professional liability policy to lapse because, as
they put it, “they never had a claim.” Firm B has no business
booked for the coming year but reports multiple “potentials.”
With no other factors revealed, which business has greater face
value and will likely command a higher offer from the Buyer?
Firm A is clearly in the superior position. Its diversified client
base, recurring contractual commitments, and comprehensive
employee protections all contribute to stability, predictability,
and reduced risk three factors that drive premium valuations.
Firm B’s reliance on a narrow customer base, lack of long-term
contracts, and exposure to uninsured risk make it a
significantly less attractive acquisition.
A consistent focus on building value to optimize company
valuation does not happen accidently. Unfortunately, many
founders spend years building a business that provides a good
income for the founders and C-suite members, but without ever
establishing an exit goal or strategy for the eventual sale of the
enterprise.
Two concurrent focuses are essential: build and maintain a
healthy day-to-day business operation, and, where possible,
implement strategies to build the all important asset of
goodwill. Profit sustains the business; goodwill sustains the
enterprise. The most valuable companies are those built with
both in balance.
— From the Office of the Managing Director